The LST or Landing Ship Tank a ship Only The Allies Had: The Ship That Could Deliver A Tank Right To The Beach!
When most people think about a tank being used in a beach assault, they think the Duplex Drive Sherman, or tanks getting delivered by LCM or LCT. There were many other specialized landing craft, and they all had similar flaws. The main being they were small, and not really capable of long ocean voyages. They also couldn’t haul a useful amount of cargo for use in an efficient shipping system. The LST or Landing Ship Tank was the solution.
The LST a large ocean-going vessel, and though they reputed to have a horrible ride, were capable of crossing the Pacific or Atlantic oceans with their own fuel stores. There were several classes of LST but the differences between them were fairly minor unless you want to get into the British made LSTs, but we’ll do that later. For our purposes we are going to use LST-808 as our example, she participated in Iwo Jima and Okinawa. She was lost to a Kamikaze towards the end of the war.
4,080 tons (sea-going draft w/1675 ton load)
2,366 tons (beaching displacement)
Length: 328 feet Beam: 50 feet
Light: 2′ 4″ front, 7′ 6″ aft
Sea-going: 8′ 3″ front, 14′ 1″ aft
Landing: 3′ 11″ front, 9’ 10″ aft (landing w/500 ton load)
Limiting: 11′ 2″
Maximum navigation: 14′ 1″
Speed: 11.6 knots. (trial) Endurance: 24,000 miles at 9kts, while displacing 3960 tons
13 officers, 104 enlisted
16 officers, 147 enlisted
Boats: 2 LCVP
Cargo Capacity: (varied with mission – payloads between 1600 and 1900 tons)
One Landing Craft Tank (LCT), tanks, wheeled and tracked vehicles, artillery, construction equipment and military supplies. A ramp or elevator forward allowed vehicles access to tank deck from the main deck
Additional capacity included sectional pontoons carried on each side of vessel amidships, to either build Rhino Barges or use as causeways. Married to the bow ramp, the causeways would enable payloads to be delivered ashore from deeper water or where a beachhead would not allow the vessel to be grounded forward after ballasting
Armament: 2 – Twin 40mm gun mounts w/Mk. 51 directors, 4 – Single 40mm gun mounts, 12- Single 20mm gun mounts
Fuel Capacity: Diesel 4,300 Bbls (approximately 180600 gallons of fuel.)
Propulsion: Two General Motors 12-567A, 900hp Diesel engines, Single Falk Main Reduction Gears
Two propellers, 1700shp, Twin rudders
Three Diesel-drive 100Kw 230V D.C. Ship’s Service Generators
As you can see from the specifications, these ships, were pretty big and over a football field long. The tank deck had a massive capacity; it could take up to 20 Sherman tanks, 39 M3/M5 light tanks or 70 trucks or anything else that would fit up to 1900 tons. Not only did they have the ability to carry the vehicles, there were accommodations aboard for the crews and troops that would be riding the ship.
The LSTs were longships, and their front hull had a much shallower draft than the rear. The front of the hull was made up from a pair of huge doors that opened out, and behind them was a ramp that was dropped. If shore conditions were right, the ramp could be dropped in the shallow surf and vehicles drove right off and onto the beach. If beach conditions were not right, like a sandbar or reef stood in the way, they could use floating pontoon docks to make a causeway that tanks or anything else could drive to shore on. These causeways would be held in place by LCMs. The LST could carry large numbers of the pontoons as deck cargo. They would know ahead of time what the beach conditions were going to be and what they would need to bring. This ingenious system was something only the allies, and specifically, the US and the UK came up with. Nazis were not good at logistics.
The LST used a system of pumps to fill or pump out large numbers of compartments all around the hull to raise or lower the ship in the water. When they were about to beach the front of the ship, the would need to be as high in the water as they could, but at sea, they would want many of the void spaces flooded to keep the flat-bottomed LST from rolling around so much in even mild weather. Even loaded up and with the ballast spaces as full as was safe, the LST’s still had a less than ideal ride. Very few were lost to weather though. I don’t have a good breakdown of the numbers but the US had 933 LST(2) and 26 were lost to enemy action. They lost another 13 to fires, collisions, explosions, storms, and groundings. The rest were worked to death in the decades after the war with a few exceptions.
One of those exceptions is LST-325, she is still around, and a museum ship, but the best kind of museum ship, the kind that can still get underway! Check out LST-325s webpage, they may be coming to a city near you!
Being an LST captain was not something a career naval officer would have wanted, and most officers were reservists. Some joined their ship while it was being built, and would stay with it until wars end, or it was sunk. The LSTs were not the worst ships to serve on, they had a nicely appointed galley, and served with the same men the whole war, including the enlisted crew. The LST proved to be pretty safe and durable because of how they were built, with a lot of reserve buoyancy. They also had the capacity to produce a lot of fresh water.
The tank deck had to be ventilated so the tanks could be run, early LSTs had hoses that were hooked up the tanks or other vehicles exhaust. That setup did not work well, so twelve, eight-foot-tall ventilation stacks, with a fan in each were installed. These could clear the tank deck of vehicle exhaust even with the bow doors closed. There was an elevator on early LSTs, but it was slow and not all that reliable, so it was replaced with a simple hinged ramp.
The ships were also well appointed with shops including a machine shop with a full complement of metalworking tools, and there was probably an electrical and hydraulic shop as well. The Captain would be a full Lieutenant of the Navy, and the XO a JG. As mentioned before in many cases these men joined the ship while it was being finished, right after they finished they Navy Officer or Boot Camp, and a few cases specialty schools. They would work with the builder to get their LST working and get it commissioned and then take it out, often right to a combat area but they might stay stateside for more training.
The Army Armor base at Fort Knox built a replica of a tank deck on the base so tank crews could practice loading and offloading. The US Navy built 1051 LSTs were built in the US. Most of them served with the US, but some went to the UK, and the Greeks even operated some. After the war, the surplus LSTs were bought up by commercial interests right away. They are very useful for delivering heavy cargo to areas with no heavy port facilities. A few survive to this day.
Now for my obligatory section on why this ship was something the Germans had nothing like. The Germans also lacked the ability to build all the different landing craft the allies used in their multiple successful amphibious landings. Germany was short of resources, and even if they had been given the plans for the LST and all the various other landing craft you need to land on an enemy shore, they didn’t have the naval construction capacity or natural resources to produce them. Maybe if they had not built their silly battleships, but that gets to the other problem, they never achieved air superiority, nor naval supremacy in a time frame they would have needed to pull off operation sea lion. Nazi Germany was bad at boats and planes, but great at propaganda, some people still buy into even today.
12 thoughts on “#39 The LST or Landing Ship Tank, a Ship That Could Land Tanks”
I’m writing a little book about my Dad’s WWII experiences on the LST 808. The 808 was built and commissioned in Evansville and went to the Pacific, was in the Iwo Jima, Okinawa and Ie Shima invasions. Was torpedoed and sunk at Ie Shima. Five killed in the engine room, crew marooned for 6 weeks. Does anyone know what the typical GQ station might be for a Gunners Mate 2c? Dad never told me his Battle Station position. I thought it might be on the twin 40 at the bow but I’m not really sure how GQ stations were determined.
I am researching Jack Tripp who was a engine Disesel mate on 808 and was aboard when hit off Le Shima.
Any mention of him in any of your reasearch?
He passed recently.
Thanks very much. Excellent site. Given their carrying capacity I often wonder why LST’s weren’t heavily armored and REALLY HEAVILY loaded with artillery, mortars, even snipers or other armament that could fire from the LST as an offensive weapon. If one side were covered with cannons like the old sailing naval ships, and the LST was driven into the beach and then swung around sideways to provide a platform for enormous fire power they might have provided a shield for those poor infantry men…on Omaha for example. 20-20 hindsight I know, and I suppose great effort was provided for the time for Normandy and Pacific invasions, but does this seem practical? Thoughts of those men charging into fire fairly unprotected bothers me. Thoughts?
Very interesting. I served on an AKA post Korea. Only niggling complaint is a small matter of needing a proof reader – something I did during my civilian employment. Thanks for gathering all the information.
You should talk about the failed attempt they had in the process of figuring out how these were made. My husband’s grandfather was on the ship that tested pontoon boats to carry tanks and it failed miserably. Went on and, flump, there it went, off the boat.
Ah, nice picture of our LST 325 sitting high and dry. She is still cruising after all these years. Come see her some time.
I would love to! Thanks for visiting my site.
The BOATS BOATS BOATS thing is from how I met your mother right?
Another great post, this one on BOATS BOATS BOATS!!! Well ships I guess, but what the difference anyway
Nice work Jeeps.
Thanks Bele! What ship is that in your avatar?
It seems to be the uss guam. Here is a site with some more pictures.https://www.navsource.org/archives/04/1202/040202.htm